<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2007-05-29</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roblef.com/2007/05/28/links-for-2007-05-29/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roblef.com/2007/05/28/links-for-2007-05-29/</link>
	<description>pulling it all together</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.roblef.com/2007/05/28/links-for-2007-05-29/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 14:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roblef.com/?p=604#comment-305</guid>
		<description>I think I fall into the group she describes as being not so noisy. Technology can certainly be used to stay connected with people but if I was being constantly made aware of all the inane minutiae of everyone I know I think my head would asplode.

She says that knowing these details creates intimacy. At the risk of becoming ensnared semantically, I see this as more of a "false intimacy." Getting short bursts of possibly useless information with no context would, I guess, not create more intimacy for me.

Also, I could be wrong but isn't the Twitter thing only one way? I.e.; here's what's going on with me but you can't interact with the Twitter stream?

This is certainly just the thing for some people and I love the simplicity of the Twitter mechanism, but a Twitterfied world would probably make me more crazy than I already am. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I fall into the group she describes as being not so noisy. Technology can certainly be used to stay connected with people but if I was being constantly made aware of all the inane minutiae of everyone I know I think my head would asplode.</p>
<p>She says that knowing these details creates intimacy. At the risk of becoming ensnared semantically, I see this as more of a &#8220;false intimacy.&#8221; Getting short bursts of possibly useless information with no context would, I guess, not create more intimacy for me.</p>
<p>Also, I could be wrong but isn&#8217;t the Twitter thing only one way? I.e.; here&#8217;s what&#8217;s going on with me but you can&#8217;t interact with the Twitter stream?</p>
<p>This is certainly just the thing for some people and I love the simplicity of the Twitter mechanism, but a Twitterfied world would probably make me more crazy than I already am. <img src='http://www.roblef.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
